Institute for War and Peace Reporting | Giving Voice, Driving Change
This power previously rested with the prosecution service, which has so far retained much of the weight it carried as the long arm of the Soviet state.
The change will mark the end of a ten-year campaign to get the reform through and reduce the mandate of the prosecutor’s office. Nevertheless, some of those who support the move are concerned that the judicial system is not up to handling arrest warrants, given its own problems with corruption. Others say the courts will need more better-quality staff to handle the volume of work.
Tohir Qodirov, who sits on the Supreme Court, says judges are ready and waiting for the change. He argues that since judges issue final sentences, they must surely be qualified to rule on whether a person should remain under arrest.
(For a recent report on the prosecution service, see Tajik Prosecutor Steps Down in Major Shakeup, RCA No. 603, 12-Feb-10.)
- Europe & Eurasia
- Latin America
- Middle East & North Africa
- Focus Pages
- Training & Resources
- Print Publications
- IWPR Spotlight